• Saleh@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I hope more hardware manufactures offer to ship without a windows license. It is cheaper for everyone and people have less hassle installing an OS of their choice on the device.

    • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If the operating system is FOSS, I’d be willing to pay 50% the cost of a Windows license but to the FOSS maintainers and the upstream distros they rely on. Gotta close the causal loop.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      oh, how times have changed, I remember nearly every budget to mid-range laptop being offered with DOS as a cost-saving measure

    • macniel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I’m pretty sure that Microsoft pays OEMs for having Windows pre installed just like any other adware.

      • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That would be wasting their market position.
        If vendors can expect say 10% of people to choose a non-windows option it would suffice for microsoft to offer a 20% discount in return for the vendor not offering such an option.

        10% might actually be a bit low, there are a lot of people willing to install windows themselves and use one of the comically easy unlock methods.