The Linux ecosystem is vast and diverse, offering a multitude of distributions to suit every need and preference. With hundreds of distros to choose from, it’s a pity that most are rarely mentioned while the popular ones are constantly being regurgitated.

This thread aims to celebrate this diversity and shine a light on smaller projects with passionate developers. I invite you to pitch your favorite underappreciated distro and share your experiences with those lesser-known Linux distributions that deserve more attention.

While there are no strict rules or banlists, I encourage you to focus on truly niche or exotic distributions rather than the more commonly discussed ones. Consider touching upon what makes your chosen distro unique:

  • What features or philosophies set it apart?
  • Why do you favor it over other distros, including the popular ones? (Beyond “It just works.”)
  • In what situations would you recommend it to others?

Whether it’s a specialized distro for a particular use case or a general-purpose OS with a unique twist, let’s explore the road less traveled in the Linux landscape. Your insights could introduce fellow enthusiasts to their next favorite distribution!

    • ___@l.djw.li
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      That sounds like true freedom, and also like something I wish deeply that I had time and energy to make my daily driver - I’m a purist, but I’m also a pragmatist and i can feel the burnout already.

      Respect for using it as a daily driver - even for a personal only machine, that’s a pretty high bar, especially long term.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      More niche? Opensuse Kalpa.

      I started running it and their are some pains like figuring out which layer to install tablet driver software, undervolting software, and kde connect. Seam flatpak still sucks dick and the tray icon for it doesn’t work at all and it needs a ton of modifications to get things to where the native steam runtime just works, but still a fun experiment.

  • ssm@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Is Alpine Linux obscure? Well, using it as a desktop is obscure, I guess. The decision to use musl libc is the main limiting factor for desktop usage, but thanks to the existence of runtime package managers like flatpak and/or static linking, you can run basically anything that requires glibc on Alpine these days (at the expense of extra disk usage for glibc libs).

    If you don’t know much about Alpine, it is an extremely lightweight Linux distro designed primarily for containers and virtualization, that ships with busybox and musl libc. It’s basically the closest you can get to GNU/Linux without the GNU. The main appeal to me is the simplicity of the tooling and installation, it’s the only Linux distribution I’ve used that gives me a similar vibe to OpenBSD. The defaults are almost perfect, but the first thing I would do when installing it is install the docs metapackage (otherwise you have no manpages), and optionally replace busybox with coreutils and friends (personally can’t stand how non-posix compliant busybox is). I’d also replace the default busybox ash shell with a nice kornlike such as oksh, a clone of the OpenBSD shell.

    • Petter1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I had PostmarkedOS, which is Alpine with some extra phone stuff

      We need more arm packages…

  • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think nixos is still niche, but seems to be gaining momentum. It has some unique features:

    • Every package has its own dependencies, so you can install a 7 year old firefox alongside the latest, and have no interference.
    • Packages with dependencies in common still share them (for space savings).
    • Abandons the HFS, but can still fake it for apps that need it.
    • Can make dev environments that are exactly reproducible across machines, and only exist within a specific shell session. So you can have a project that relies on an out of date version of a compiler, and another that uses the latest, and run both at the same time.
    • Make your own packages that other people can install using a git repo address.
    • The package language can also describe a machine’s configuration; systemd services, default packages, user accounts, etc.
    • You can build and remotely deploy a machine config in one line.
    • You can cross compile a machine config for another cpu architecture, like ARM.
    • OS upgrades are atomic, and reversible. If it doesn’t work out, you can go back to the previous config.
    • No reason to ever reinstall. Recently upgraded a machine that had sat in a closet for 5 years to the newest release. Flawless upgrade.
    • Nixos boasts more packages than any other distro, over 100,000.

    There are certainly downsides - poor docs, confusing core language. Instructions for installing something on say debian will not work on nixos. I do think this style of package management is the future, if perhaps not this specific implementation. It can be a pain but its also super solid.

    • jevans ⁂@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I use NixOS on my workstations, and I’m slowly migrating many of my server VMs over to it.

      NixOS w/flakes + home-manager + impermanence on zfs + disko w/ nixos-anywhere is amazing and gives an insane amount of declarative control over your system.

      That said, the current state of the leadership gives me pause to recommend it to anyone, and I do have a few devil’s advocate responses to some of what you said:

      Every package has its own dependencies, so you can install a 7 year old firefox alongside the latest, and have no interference.

      Unless the dependency is Qt, then it better all be the same version.

      Abandons the HFS, but can still fake it for apps that need it.

      Using ldd and nix-alien to patch in dynamic libraries still sucks, and often doesn’t work without a lot of extra effort. If what I want isn’t in nixpkgs, and I can’t get nix-alien to work on the first try, I just end up not using whatever I want trying to run.

      • pr06lefs@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I hear you, its great for most cases, but when a package isn’t available or downloads binaries that depend on hfs it sucks. I’ve been going through hell with android dev lately and am currently doing my compiles on debian, lol.

  • averyminya@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    I like TailsOS, which is an amnesiac system that runs entirely in RAM and boots from a USB hard drive. The goal for the operating system is to be a safe operating system for people who are in compromising situations - from international reporters to survivors of domestic abuse, it is a way to highly reduce your ability to be tracked.

    The downsides of amnesiac systems are obvious - without enabling the setting for permanent storage, effectively everything you do on the OS is lost every time. And if you do enable persistent memory, well, that’s not exactly entirely safe if you are caught out.

    What I like the OS for though is as someone who is not compromised or in a situation where I need these privacies (despite appreciating them), my usage of it makes it safer for others who are using it (since internet is through Tor), and I feel more comfortable using computers in the wild when needed, since I’m not logging in on the public operating system that will be used by everybody else.

    Many people give these projects flack or diminish their values as a “daily driver”, but I think often times forget the important aspects of them. They may not be a daily driver for you or I by nature of our needs, but they are certainly important daily drivers for others. In addition to that, supporting a project that helps people in compromised situations and becoming another node to bounce off of (again, Tor, not inherent to the usage of this OS) is a nice additional benefit.

    Tl;DR amnesiac operating systems because they’re simple, straightforward, and make you feel more like whitehat hackerman when you’ve done nothing at all.

  • bsergay@discuss.onlineOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    May as well contribute my own 😜.

    I’m an absolute sucker for exquisitely hardened distros. Hence, distros like Qubes OS and Kicksecure have rightfully caught my interest. However, the former’s hardware requirements are too harsh on the devices I currently own. While the latter relies on backports for security updates; which I’m not a fan of. Thankfully, there is also secureblue.

    Contrary to the others, secureblue is built on top of an ‘immutable’ and/or atomic base distro; namely Fedora Atomic. By which:

    • It’s protected against certain attacks.
    • Enables it to benefit from more recent advancements and developments that benefit security without foregoing robustness.

    If security is your top priority, Qubes OS is the gold standard. However, secureblue is a decent (albeit inferior) alternative if you prefer current and/or ‘immutable’/atomic distros.

  • makeasnek@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not a distro but Qubes. Incredible security and privacy out of the box. Not for everyone but absolutely one of the most interesting developments in the OS world in the past decade or two.

      • bsergay@discuss.onlineOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Not the person you asked, but they might have referred to the fact that (technically) Qubes OS is not a Linux distro because it’s based on Xen instead. Though, even then, we might refer to it as a Xen distro (if anything).

  • Presi300@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Alpine. The Linux, not GNU/Linux joke aside, Alpine’s kinda great. Light, fast, stable, great package manager. I’ve daily driven it on both a server and as my main distro and it’s pretty nice for both… Unless you’re on Nvidia.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      My first intro to it was with postmarketOS, and I have to say it felt super light and stable

    • Jolteon@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Huh, I’d never actually considered that Alpine Linux existed as something other than a base for docker containers.

    • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Want there a post I saw just the other day about Nvidia starting to make open source releases with one of the upcoming driver updates? I just saw it yesterday and didn’t even think I checked it out yet but it’s somewhere here on my “look at better later” lists here.

      It would be fine then if that was true.

  • roux [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Not gonna lie, I thought elementaryOS was gonna take off and I guess it never did. I used it on my school laptop when I was in college for most of the time there. It was fine but mostly just a sleaker looking Mint basically.

  • puppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Haha nice try. If everyone starts liking it then it won’t be niche anymore. So I won’t share it! /s

  • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not niche, but surely exotic: NixOS, a distribution that is configured via a purely functional language. There is no such thing as installing or uninstalling packages, you add or remove things from your configuration and then simply apply that configuration.

    • canadaduane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I really wanted to like NixOS (and I do, theoretically), but I couldn’t dedicate more than 5 full days over Christmas to learn how to get to a working development system.

        • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think it could be good for something like an office, where it might be beneficial to have everyone on an identical setup that’s immutable so they can’t mess with it, and can (presumably) be duplicated by just copying a config file.

          I assume the con would be that if something breaks in an update, it probably breaks for everyone. But by the same token, the solution should fix it for everyone too.

        • Laser@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Using it on all my machines (desktop and notebooks), can’t really complain – but then again, couldn’t really complain about Arch either

      • Laser@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        May I ask what the issue actually was? Was it about “working system” or about “working development system”?

        I don’t recall needing more than two days for getting a system up and running for the first time, and in fact it worked so well that I switched all my machines to it by now; granted, I have changed a lot about the configuration ever since and there seem to be a lot of paths to take in the beginning and it’s not always clear which one to take. But getting a working system, even one suited for development (personally, I’d recommend a nix development shell for that), shouldn’t really take that long.

      • governorkeagan@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        I couldn’t even get the installer to work. Tried a couple times but it just wouldn’t install so I gave up on it - still want to try it though

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Dietpi for me. It is meant for sbc’s, but it can (also) be installed on x86 pcs. And its focus is on minimalism – as much as possible.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      I love dietpi. The entire software install is a huge 1000 line bash script. If that sounds horrific, it’s genuinely well structured and readable

      • ___@l.djw.li
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        It does sound horrific, but mostly because it would be poorly executed by many devs.

        Well, and the seeming trend towards install commands that look like curl $file.sh | sh

        But if they’re not actively encouraging that, I see no issue with a well maintained install tool, created from well maintained toolsets that work on essentially any platform.

        • gerdesj@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Never heard of sh, I use bash and I call it as /usr/bin/bash (for security).