Ubuntu has too many problems for me to want to run it. However, it has occurred to me that there aren’t a lot of distros that are like the Ubuntu LTS.

Basic requirements for a LTS:

  • at least 2 years of support
  • semi recent versions of applications like Chrome and Firefox (might consider flatpak)
  • a stable experience that isn’t buggy
  • fast security updates

Distros considered:

  • Debian (stable)
  • Rocky Linux
  • openSUSE
  • Cent OS stream
  • Fedora

As far as I can tell none of the options listed are quite suitable. They are either to unstable or way to out of date. I like Rocky Linux but it doesn’t seem to be desktop focused as far as I can tell. I would use Debian but Debian doesn’t have the greatest security defaults. (No selinux profiles out of the box)

  • Mactan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    what is the actual use case of LTS on regular desktop non-workstation anyway?

            • LeFantome@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I am not going to say that you are wrong. Make your own choices.

              For words to be useful though, they have to mean the same thing for the person sharing them and the person receiving them. Definitions matter.

              In the Linux community, “stable” means not changing. It is not a statement about quality or reliability. The others words you used, “buggy” and “broken”, are better quality references.

              Again, you do you. But expect “the community” to reinforce their definitions because common understanding is essential if something like Lemmy is going to work.

        • Tattorack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Cutting edge versions aren’t stable either. You’re essentially a beta tester for new features that may end up in an LTS release.

          I’d rather have an LTS release where things have generally been tested well enough to warrant an LTS release.

          • azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d say it depends and it’s mostly just a theory that applies in some cases (like with kernel, critical infrastructure, server software) but usually desktop stack in LTS is just stinky old, which doesn’t make it any more stable, in some cases less stable.

            Usually desktop environments are locked to some old versions and in theory fixes should get applied by the distro maintainers. In practice, actual developers behind desktops long moved on and don’t support it, bugs can only be fixed by huge code rework and it can’t be easily applied on top of old version (or can introduce new bugs and require testing). You end up with bugs that were fixed in upstream like 2 years ago and you will only get it improved upon new LTS upgrade cycle.

            For example, LTS absolutely sucks for Plasma, because for last few years, each version is less and less buggy. On Debian/Ubuntu you won’t even get current version as they release the new OS, let alone recent inprovement

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Stable in the Linux world means that it doesn’t change often, not that it never has anything wrong with it. That means that if you come across a bug, it’s most likely well researched and has solutions. When you use a bleeding edge distro you’re left to your own troubleshooting skills or begging for help.

    • Shareni@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Is the system working after the install? If yes, it’ll work for years until the next version and you don’t need to worry about it. With rolling release every update can mess up your system.

      • Mactan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s software, every update can mess up your system. your only guaranteed good media is the install ISO, after that it’s only as good as the packager, even for LTS

        • Shareni@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you’re going to be pedantic, not even an ISO is guaranteed to work perfectly. The point is that a security patch is far less likely to cause issues than some random release. And that’s even before going into broken releases like GRUB on arch.

          • Mactan@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            LTS ISO aren’t guaranteed to work? isn’t that the point, install once and run forever?

  • Toine@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rocky linux is definitely for desktop too. It was designed as a successor of Centos, which was widely used in medium and big companies. We currently use Rocky 8 where I work. It works fine.

  • Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mint is built on Ubuntu LTS but removes some of the problematic bits, it has a recent Firefox and Chrome is of course available, Fletpak support is also integrated.

    I’ve run Alma and RHEL as a desktop and it was fine, my main use case was “like Fedora but stable” (more than a year of support). However the repositories are very limited, even with EPEL and third parties, so it eventually irked me enough to switch away. Also no btrfs support without replacing the kernel and adding support from third party places.

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What issues does Ubuntu LTS have that you need to overcome?

    What use case ? - desktops for office work, music production, a student lab?

    FWIW. Kubuntu is my favorite, generally used for research and reading, light web mail.

      • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        In contrast to those “many reviews”, this reviewer says that Ubuntu is fine and always has been.

        Seriously, Ubuntu hate is mostly just Snap hate. The Snap problem is overstated and easily worked around if necessary. Ubuntu remains a very solid choice on desktop.

  • thejml@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly, we (a large Fortune 500 company hosting sites serving between 250m and 500m unique monthly visitors) have standardized on Ubuntu LTS and Rocky Linux. Both have been rock solid. Kubernetes and other things that need regular updates and patches (aka things that directly power forward facing apis/sites) tend to be Ubuntu and the rest Rocky. We do NOT however run any ui’s or browsers or the like on them. I highly recommend against doing so on any server.

    If you mean desktop, we tend to not use Linux for desktop apps, instead going with MacOS and Windows with group policies and forced updates. Definitely prefer the stability of MacOS over Windows, but both have their place in the enterprise. When I was running a Linux desktop there, it was Fedora Silverblue. Snaps are not my friend.

    • Sickday@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey just to ptich in my two cents. Our shop is running a very similar setup (Enterprise FinTech, MAU is around 100-200m across all sites), with Ubuntu and Rocky on k8s with all workstations running MacOS and Windows since compliance policies are easy to apply to both. I can vouch for Ubuntu LTS given other options. Doesn’t require a support contract, really solid security patch cycles and everything runs without issues.

      Also unsure of using Linux as a workstation solution since at the time of setup, all the viable distos required you to either manually roll a compliance solution, or use their specific sometimes built-in solutions (see RHEL). That may have changed in the passed few years though.

  • Shareni@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They are either to unstable or way to out of date.

    Just use flatpak/appimage/distrobox/nix. Half of my packages are Debian stable (MX), the other half are nix unstable.

    Debian doesn’t have the greatest security defaults. (No selinux profiles out of the box)

    It does have apparmor though. If you need selinux specifically, then that’s going to limit your choices to like RH and Suse distros.

  • bob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Tails. It may not be designed for LTS, but it appears to be stable and secure.

  • KISSmyOSFeddit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you want to run Linux on Enterprise workstations and expect enterprise level release cycles and support durations, you’re not shopping for one of the free (as in beer) distros.
    SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop is the best offering. It comes with 7 years of standard support and another 3 years of extended support.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As suggested elsewhere, I think your requirements map quite well to Linux Mint. I prefer the Debian Edition but it has a shorter support window ( not LTS ).

    If you want / need selinux then you are in the RHEL camp. Others have proposed Rocky. I would do Alma. Either way, the desktop software is going to be ancient. One solution is Flatpak. Another is distrobox.

    An Alma desktop with applications coming from an Arch install via Distrobox would be the best of both worlds. The desktop and overall environment would be rock stable, secure, and boring. Yet the library of applications would be huge and, once installed, they would stay very up-to-date.”

  • exanime@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As far as I can tell none of the options listed are quite suitable. They are either to unstable or way to out of date. I like Rocky Linux but it doesn’t seem to be desktop focused as far as I can tell. I would use Debian but Debian doesn’t have the greatest security defaults. (No selinux profiles out of the box)

    Check your requirements … I get that you may need 2 year support and you cannot control that, but are you really going to dismiss one of the greatest Linux distros of all time because the “defaults” are not to your liking? You know you can configure it however you want after the installation right?

    If you are going to value stability and nice wallpaper with the same importance, you’ll never find a “quite suitable” match

    • jakepi@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Debian Testing + flatpak

      Testing is shockingly stable, kind of up to date, and rolling. Since you will use Flatpak for all your apps it really removes a lot of risk that dependencies will break an app.

      I use this combo as my daily driver for my work PC, knock on wood it’s been super solid!