• neonred@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m happy to say “i run arch btw” (actually CachyOS but without most of the weird cachyos-stuff but still using their v3 repositories) for about two weeks now. It’s pretty great so far, no breakages or anything, feels a bit faster and updates are much quicker to do, too.

    Alongside with Debian sid and flakified NixOS of course…

  • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve used arch on one machine now, am a total noob to it, and I really like it. I see what people are raving about and I see no reason to shit on it. I don’t really care if 6 years ago some people were annoying about it

      • ByteWelder@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The existence of ArchWiki and the Arch User Respository (AUR). And rolling releases, if that’s your thing.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Basically just the fact that it’s very lightweight, I was able to install it on an rpi5 (not officially supported), install only what I needed, and was able to resolve all the issues I had for my niche use-case.

        There is a quite noticeable difference in how snappy it feels versus the official rpi OS. Arch runs way zippier on it. Those devices are a little limited hardware-wise so it makes a big difference in what it feels like to use that system.

        I also like knowing that the updates flowing in so quickly, I get the latest fixes and new features before I would on any of the other distros I’ve used. I have always been a little scared of rolling releases but over the last couple months I haven’t seen any breakages yet so fingers crossed! A lot of people have tried to tell me rolling release can be solid, but I was skeptical.

        • bort@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          snappy it feels versus the official rpi OS

          I blame the desktop manager. Once I ditched the default von on the pi, and replaced it with standard gnome, the pi became almost as snappy as my regular notebook.

          in general: standard debian should be exactly as light-weight as arch.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a bit tounge in cheek, nobody actually got mad at the arch namedropping. More like “I’m a platinum level player in LoL”. Lol.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I always got the impression that it was more of an “Oh god one of THESE insufferable people”. I’m just saying from my experience – they have a point. Arch is pretty nice.

        • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Faster, more stable, no systemd, supports musl and architectures not usually supported by most distros. It’s probably the most stable rolling release distro out there.

            • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              No, just bootup and general responsivness of the system. Software is still compiled by the ssme compilers used in other distros. Everything is not magically faster.

              Though on the musl build, yeah, it is faster. Trouble is, you can’t run glibc software on it. Through chroot, yeah, but natively, no.

            • 56!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago
              • The package manager is extremely fast
              • The lack of systemd reduces startup time
              • The musl libc marginally speeds up programs
            • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              The main benefit is that when people get tired of distro flame wars, they can move on init system flame wars.

                • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I literally haven’t run into a single one in the whole time Arch has been using it.

                  (I installed Arch shortly before it switched to systemd and have been using it since without pause)

                • throwwyacc@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What are the systemd bugs that are so bad? I kinda get the bloated comment, but I don’t really mind when it serves its purpose

              • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                I have no horse in this race, I don’t have strong feelings about it either way as long as it works. But I can’t help but notice that OP skipped replying to me.

                • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  OP said “bloated and full of bugs”.

                  I’ve been using Arch since shortly before they started using systemd and literally never ran into a systemd bug.

                  I have no clue at this point what “bloated” means. Maybe if everything works and you don’t have to hack up your own solution all the time, that’s “bloat”?

            • Yes. From their website:

              C library diversity

              Void Linux supports both the musl and GNU libc implementations, patching incompatible software when necessary and working with upstream developers to improve the correctness and portability of their projects.

            • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, there are basically 2 builds for every architecture. One is glibc, the other is musl. I haven’t used the musl builds that much, just toyed with them a few times (mainly because of lack of software), but if you only use open source software that doesn’t specifically depend on the GNU toolchain, yes, you can daily drive it, no doubt there. And yes, it is faster than the glibc builds.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Interesting. I will have to try it some time. I just know on my raspberry pi 5, out of the few OSes I could get to run on it, Arch was the fastest and smoothest running, and gets updates all the time. All this, even though rpi5 is not even officially supported yet!

                • 0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  The syntax is a bit different, but everything else, more or less the same. In fact, if you just wanna repackage a deb or an rpm, it’s even easier than in Arch, xbps-src can handle deb and rpm automatically, it detects dependencies and does repackaging on it’s own. You basically just have to feed it the deb/rpm file in a one liner, that’s it.

                  I should probably give an example. Here is the template file (they’re called templates in Void) for Viber. You basically just feed it the deb, do a vcopy (copy operation specific to xbps-src) and that’s it, everything else regarding the repackaging is done automatically by xbps-src.

  • MyNamesNotRobert@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I couldn’t figure out how to make the wifi on my Debian machine reliable so I replaced the default wifi manager front-end and backend with iwctl, the same thing Arch uses by default. It seems to be working but now I have an unholy abomination of Debian spliced with Arch DNA.

  • sayitghoul@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t see what the problem is with Arch Linux and why it gets so much flak. I am not a Linux expert by any measure, but I use EndeavourOS and find it really use to use (don’t ask me to install from scratch). Its extremely stable and I like the fact that it gets updated constantly.

    The only other distro I really liked is MX Linux. My main gripe was that I don’t want to reinstall every so many years. I want to set up an OS and just use it without worrying about it being a temporary thing. But maybe I’ll change my mind in the future.

    I’m not for or against any distro really, maybe except Ubuntu and its bloat. I just use what best suits me, which is the whole point of all the different distros.

    • 56!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think this is an “Arch is bad” post, but rather a “Void is good post”. I think the sticker is remove because it’s not relevant to them anymore.

    • Communist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Manjaro is truly the worst distro of all time and probably helps give arch a bad name

    • tubaruco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      i think its just people taking the “i use arch btw” meme too seriously and thinking its bad to show or even use it all