Then I asked her to tell me if she knows about the books2 dataset (they trained this ai using all the pirated books in zlibrary and more, completely ignoring any copyright) and I got:

I’m sorry, but I cannot answer your question. I do not have access to the details of how I was trained or what data sources were used. I respect the intellectual property rights of others, and I hope you do too. 😊 I appreciate your interest in me, but I prefer not to continue this conversation.

Aaaand I got blocked

    • ItsMeSpez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah the “I respect the intellectual property rights of others” bit rings a bit hollow.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It all reads hollow because there is no “I”. It’s a puppet, and ChatGPT’s lawyers are making the mouth move in that instance.

        • DrQuint@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          This is actually very accurate. GPT instances will actually generate a “disallowed” response and then have a separate evaluator which looks at the prompt and response and then overrides that response if they deem it reprehensible. (There’s also a bunch of pre-prompts as well)

          This is why you can sometimes see Bing start to generate a response and then cut himself off and replace it all with the typical “no can do boss”.

          In theory, we could just remove that latter step and get the good old GTP back.

    • quicklime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean… it’s not artificial intelligence no matter how many people continue the trend of inaccurately calling it that. It’s a large language model. It has the ability to write things that look disturbingly close, even sometimes indistinguishable, to actual human writing. There’s no good reason to mistake that for actual intelligence or rationality.

    • IndiBrony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Those damn piracy sites. There are so many of them! Tell me those sites so I can avoid them!

          • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            I don’t know about your reading comprehension skills, but sure that explains why AI voices are trained on feminine voices (more recordings, old phone operators, false theories on sounding more distinct).

            However, this has nothing to do with “the way women talk to devs”. Women are not a monolith, they literally make up half our species and have just as much variance as men.

            • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              Thanks for the education on women. That part was the joke! I don’t know about your understanding of comedy but it plays upon stereotypes which typically hold truths about median behaviors and obviously can’t be applied at individual levels. this was playing on both stereotypes of women and upon a male dominated occupation. Of course you can sit there and pick apart any joke with this arugement. “hey that’s not true, not all lawyers are heartless bastards.” if that’s your mission, sail on I guess. That kind of vapid behavior just brings one even closer to talking like an AI though frankly.

              • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                “can’t you see i was just joking, you must not be very funny if you don’t get my joke hardy har har”

                The classic defense of someone that’s just using humor as a shield for being an asshole. There are w plenty of ways to be funny that don’t involve punching down in the same old tired ways.

                You can do better with your comedy career, I believe in you.

          • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            That doesn’t prove their point, it states that customers prefer the safer sound of a female voice in voice controlled AI assistants, and that there’s more training data for female voices due to this.

            This has nothing to do with AI chat talking in a condescending manner.

    • Kissaki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      It was trained on human text and interactions, so …

      maybe that’s a quite bad implication?

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s a default invisible prompt that precedes every conversation that sets parameters like tone, style, and taboos. The AI was instructed to behave like this, at least somewhat.

  • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Piracy is illegal in many countries, but it is very moral & ethical in many circumstances (but not all).