• boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you dont care about Ad search engines, Studies, Pocket, Google Safebrowsing, search suggestions, a start page with ads, weak privacy settings, all cookies saved forever, no adblocking, a unique canvas fingerprint, a user agent containing your Linux Distro,…

        I went through the arkenfox user.js and literally all of it minus 20 or so settings just make sense. The rest are kinda overkill, but really, Firefox is horrible out of the box.

        It is really modular luckily

        • jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          “horrible” being mostly sensible for the average user, as well as basic telemetry for making development much easier. but muhhh nooo with that information they can know who exactly I am!!! preach!!!

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          really, Firefox is horrible out of the box.

          It is really modular luckily

          Taking shit, but even you still have to recognize excellent software design.

          • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Stop harrassing me please. Just because you are fine with something, you cant say anyone else is talking shit.

            Firefox is really modular, and that makes it different from the other browers.

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I don’t see how a couple of replies could be considered harassment just because I used the phrase “talking shit”. The fact is that you’re fear mongering, and you apparently don’t like it being questioned.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Most of these aren’t issues or are “solved” in a couple of seconds.

          I am curious, exactly how would it be remotely possible for me to care that my UA string mentions Ubuntu when that’s not even technically my distro? I cannot summon an ounce of concern there. Seriously, how the hell would that matter in the least to anyone?

            • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              I knew you would say that. I imagine that user agent strings as a concept are bad, in your opinion?

              • boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                8 months ago

                They are useful to differentiate mobile from PC devices. That is not needed as many Websites are dynamic, but useful for some.

                As all browsers also support the common web standards, it is also not necessary for determining supported features or something.

                The only other use I find is having download links targeting the platform, but especially on Linux that is not really useful

                • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  “useful” is relative. I prefer a world where websites can know which platforms users are coming from, as it helps them know where to focus their support efforts.

                  There are billions of users but probably only a few OSes mentioned in UA strings so it seems like a decent trade off to me. My exact UA string is likely shared by millions of users even though my OS is somewhat rare on the world stage. Until the day comes that web browsers work exactly the same way on every platform, at which case I’d agree with you, no longer useful. Unfortunately for decades we’ve been quite a bit short of that end.

                  Just checked because I couldn’t remember exactly what OS info mine included last I looked. It’s quite generic: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0

    • MadBigote@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      I saw a post earlier this week where Firefox was adding an AI to the browser? That’d make me migrate to libre wolf or water fox.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Jokes on you, cause a lot of alphabet organizations set up entry and exit nodes on Tor so you’re being tracked regardless.

      • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Most of my Tor activity is on onionsites, so that’s okay.

        Also, even given spooky nodes, the chances of getting a spooky entry and exit node are slim. Still, given the possibility, it is advisable to do spicy clearnet activities away from home with a MAC randomizer as insurance in case you win the world’s worst roulette game.

        • linearchaos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think the big problem I have with tor is that there’s no way to know how compromised the network is. From a three letter agency budget, setting up 30,000 nodes wouldn’t be a big deal, you just have them doing other things.

          Of course, I’m not really doing anything that would draw the ire of a three-letter agency, so even tor is overkill.

          I was also never really big on people running bad s*** through my node. I’ve always felt better using a paid proxy then at least claims not to log, Even if there’s a half decent chance that people are watching their ingress and egress at the ISP level.

  • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I use Librewolf and TBB. Both have NoScript enabled and JS turned off by default. I never turn on JS on TBB obviously, and for the few sites that I frequent on Librewolf, I tweaked it by hand. It’s not that hard.

    I will look to also use Mullvad browser alongside Librewolf maybe, not sure which one of them is more private since Mullvad browser comes straight from the TOR project and has their security settings.

  • Brownian Motion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Fuck firefox. Are you sheep just going to ignore all the shit they put you through, and didn’t even explain themselves?

    Firefox is a shitshow, I don’t care “how good they are now”. If you don’t remember how bad they treated you circa 2012, then fuck off groupie wanker.

    Firefox is where they are for a good reason, they cannot be trusted. Only wankers keep promoting them.

    • Asudox@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      To be frank, Chromium’s security is much better than Firefox and is faster as well. If Google had no monopoly over the browser market and allowed uBlock Origin, I wouldn’t really use Firefox and use something FOSS chromium based instead.

      Mozilla is not a good company at all. They are a pretend privacy company while paying the bills off of your data and Google’s sponsorship.

      So I am using Firefox not because it is good but to use uBlock Origin and to prevent Google’s monopoly.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      So you want us to use what, Chrome or some Chrome clone? There isn’t a lot of options. That’s why Librewolf exists

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      If you don’t see how bad Chromium browsers are treating you circa right now then I don’t know what to say.

  • hirage@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Well, I use them all. It depends on the services I access and the threats that affect them (and therefore me). Firefox for studying and sites that use WebGL; Librewolf for everyday browsing. Oh yeah, and there’s Tor.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They lost my trust when they altered clicked URLs to add their own referral links. Making the links you click on actually go exactly where they say is like the most basic thing browsers should be expected to do.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Hahahahahahaha.

      From the maker of Palantir (facial recognition software used by nearly every police force in north america).

      Funder of JD Vance,

      and a good friend of putin.

      Peter Thiel.

  • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Librewolf. I yearn for something better for ios. I’m sticking woth firefox because all my tabs & shit are synced.

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There isn’t going to be something better because of the locked down proprietary ecosystem. You might as well use Safari