• nexussapphire@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It doesn’t mean much, it’s just a metric people like around here. This number can grow and shrink just as easily with spoofed user agents strings. I think brave spoofs it and there’s a chrome extension, there maybe a few more examples.

      I wouldn’t take it at face value is what I’m getting at. There’s just no other way to measure because most distros don’t collect telemetry and Firefox doesn’t seem to make theirs public.

      • Grimpen@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I stopped distro hopping around a decade ago, and just use default Ubuntu LTS releases. No shade from me.

        I’m not going to pretend that Ubuntu is the coolest, hippest, trendiest distro around, but it’s good enough, stake enough, and gosh darn it I’m just used to it.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ubuntu is great because they have a huge community and an enterprise-class, fully supported product. No shade for using it. It’s not my cup of tea, I often find myself wanting to be more on the bleeding edge, and I’ve found Endeavor (an Arch variant) to be amazingly capable.

          But I’ve also been using Linux on and off since 97 and exclusove (at least in personal life) since like 2015.

  • anon987@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    StatCounter statistics are directly derived from hits—as opposed to unique visitors—from 3 million sites, which use StatCounter, resulting in total hits of more than 15 billion per month.[5] No artificial weightings are used to correct for sampling bias, thus the numbers in the statistics can not be considered to be representative samples.

  • Psiczar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve got LXC’s running on my Proxmox host and been playing or working with Linux for 25 years, but on my desktop I’ve always run Windows. Linux is great right up until it isn’t and then I spend more time than I’d like troubleshooting it. On my desktop I just want things to work and Windows does that. I hate the bloatware, spyware and the nagging to switch to Edge, but everything I run, runs, including games with anti-cheat. I’m sure I could get Linux to a similar state, but it would take a lot more effort.

    • raw@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      o

      The freedom of choice is wonderful, isnt it ? We are all free, to make our own decisions, as free as to live with the consequencies out of that^^

  • Eugenia@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Linux also surpassed 10% in my country, Greece (10.72%).

    I prepared a couple of old laptops I had around recently, to gift to my niece and cousin, and I put Debian with XFce in both of them. Worked great. And I think that’s why Linux is big in Greece. Consider that when someone buys a car here, they use it until the end of its life. Very rarely they sell cars to get something new. The average car is 15 years old in Greece. I think that’s the deal with old laptops and computers too: people try to extend the lives of their machines.

  • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I moved back to Windows for the games years ago. But I’m never going to install a copy of Windows 11 because fuck that shit, and the next time I move to Linux, I suspect games won’t be a problem.

    Have they fixed Discord streaming yet?

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never understood how this is good for Linux. Why is having more users so important?

    • LeFantome@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would certainly benefit if more hardware supported Linux out-of-the-box.

      Many people will benefit if that one key application they need is supported on Linux.

      We all benefit from the paid developers working on Linux. The number of such people are linked to the profitability of Linux for companies which is a function of popularity.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You’ve never understood how support works? It doesn’t matter that it’s harder to find apps that work on Linux than windows and Mac? It matters less to me than most people but it definitely still matters

    • markus99@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      More users means there is more interest from private companies to reach these users and to port their software/products to Linux. Ie Adobe, Games, AutoCAD Suit, etc.

      • const_void@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        But why do we want more proprietary software running on Linux? Wouldn’t we be recreating the same situation that Windows has?

        • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Proprietary software is one of the last anchors holding people to Windows or macOS.

          Ideally, people would switch to FOSS alternatives on a FOSS OS, but proprietary software on top of a FOSS OS is better than FOSS software on a proprietary OS.

          Also, people are going to charge for software in some form or fashion. The economic model would need to change in order to allow people to develop software without any economic motives.

        • Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          People don’t like frequently dual-booting or switching operating systems. If someone needs a specific program for work, and that program only works on windows, chances are they will only use windows.

          Many people have to use proprietary software at work, which means most computers for work have to run windows. If linux can get enough marketshare to get support for the necessary programs that people have to use, that will free them up to not use windows at all.

        • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          But why do we want more proprietary software running on Linux?

          You’re right, there’s downsides for the FOSS community, but it’s much better for many individuals.

          Usability, accessibility and privacy for a user is better when any proprietary software, that they cannot avoid, can at least run relatively sandboxed inside an OS they have control over.

          Wouldn’t we be recreating the same situation that Windows has?

          Good point, but thankfully, an open OS mitigates these issues a great deal.

        • TheHarpyEagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The difference is that, with a base FOSS OS, you’re not locked in to an flavor you don’t like. Dislike the way Ubuntu is headed? Switch to Debian, Pop, or Mint and use the same exact programs you’re used to. If you dislike Windows 11, you’ve only got a few years before you’re forced to switch to it. Makes it much easier for them to force shitty decisions.

          More adoption of Linux also means more incentive for FOSS projects to support it. Yes, it also means more proprietary software, but the truth is that most people don’t care what kind of software they use as long as it works for them. At least Linux can’t become beholden to the demands of that software.

        • shrugal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          But why do we want more proprietary software running on Linux?

          Because it’s what reality looks like right now. Everything FOSS would be ideal, but it’s probably not going to happen for a looooong time. In the meantime more software is always good, and it also means more FOSS software you can choose as an alternative.

          Wouldn’t we be recreating the same situation that Windows has?

          No, because the base OS is still open, so you have choices that you don’t have under Windows.

          Why downvote me instead of replying with a reason why I’m “wrong” or discussing further?

          Tbh it sounds a bit disingenuous when you say that you don’t understand such a basic thing. It should be pretty obvious that more users means more interest from devs+companies and more support for the platform.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s also more chances of FOSS being developed for Linux if more people use it. FOSS is better the more popular it gets.

          • const_void@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            This seems like wishful thinking to me. Is there any data that supports that with more users comes more FOSS developers?

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure you need data to understand that if more people use a product, there’s a greater chance someone will develop FOSS for it, as FOSS developers tend to also be users.

            • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Bigger platforms attract more devs.

              The BSDs don’t have the dev resources of Linux simply because Linux has a much larger install base.

              • scratchandgame@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                Tiếng Việt
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The BSDs don’t have the dev resources of Linux simply because Linux has a much larger install base.

                Really?

                I don’t think OpenBSD is as funded as Debian but it could maintain software like OpenSSH (even the portable version for Linux and Windows); LibreSSL (still not much used, but funded because of this), OpenSMTPD.

                But OpenBSD can maintain its ports which in my opinion is relatively large (no update for -release, sorry :) ). And base. For so many hardware platform. Even VAX until 6.9

  • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Don’t panic, thats just me running it on PC, laptop, worklaptop, pinenote, pinephone, steamdeck and in multiple VMs for experimentation.

    • Grangle1@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Was gonna ask if this stat included the Steam Deck, as that’s also accounting for the vast majority of Linux gaming numbers. Whether it does include the Deck or not, it’s a nice rise, but all the better if it doesn’t include the Deck. I wonder if the popularity of using Linux on the Raspberry Pi is helping too.

      • SuperIce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        How many people are reading blogs on their steam decks though? I don’t think it’s having much of an effect for statcounter

        • Grangle1@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You never know, given the Deck has desktop mode. That said, still is a good thing with or without the Deck bolstering the numbers.

      • Deckweiss@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not great tbh. But I made it work for my usecase somewhat.

        As a huge tinkerer I like it over the Remarkable2 which I had before and which was a huge pain to customize.

        But I wouldn’t recommend it to normal people.

  • njordomir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    With MS enshitifying Windows at an ever increasing pace and the hard work of open source developers, volunteers, advocates, to make Linux better and more approachable, I won’t be surprised at all to see that percentage move up.

    “You mean its free and doesn’t try to sell me other products the whole time I’m using it?”

    • Aurix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is the psychological factor that Windows behaves more like malware with their forced full screen overlays to shove the Edge into your ass. Over and over again. Microsoft doesn’t take No for an answer like an abusive partner.

      • njordomir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You put words to the feeling I get whenever I turn on my work PC. It has relatively little to do with my actual work. It’s the dread of the psychological abuse of everything asking me to update, upgrade, and look at how cool our AI is, try all of our other products, share your opinion, etc. etc. etc. I would be twice as productive if they let me BYOOS (bring your own OS) and if my day to day tools were Linux compatible. There are best practices for this kind of thing, but many of the most “reputable” tech companies willingly disregard them in favor of mind games and dark psychology.

    • FoxBJK@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And Microsoft keeps enshitifying Windows because they know they can get away with it. So many businesses are backed into a corner and have essential parts of their business that are only compatible with Microsoft’s tech. They can’t switch, they won’t even entertain the idea (much less the time/energy required to test it out). The folks at Microsoft know they’ve won. I won’t be surprised when they make Windows 12’s compatibility even more egregious than 11’s.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    on an unrelated note, people who squeeze in what os they use to every conversation also rises to 4%.

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is equating Linux users to vegans a thing? I came to the conclusion (I thought) on my own…but now reading this here I’m questioning that conclusion

        • ResoluteCatnap@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          “how do you know someone [does crossfit, is vegan, uses linux]”

          “They’ll tell you”

          It’s a fairly common joke and seems to get stapled onto any lifestyle choice that someone likes to talk about

          • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Linux users are like vegetarians Arch users like vegans. One is a dietary choice, the other a cult.

        • freedumb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s a big thing because it’s much easier to make fun of an objectively better lifestyle choice (avoiding meat or Microsoft etc.) than it is to try and argue against it. Especially because that would force people to question their own behaviour and that can be difficult and hurtful.

          • Artemis_Mystique@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            hey I try to be vegan for software, but a moderate and balanced diet is the objectively better lifestyle choice than forcing beans and grass down your throat, and producing enough methane to power 2 dutch ovens.(I am from a predominantly vegetarian culture, most of our meat dishes have only 10% meat in them, which I think is a good enough amount)

          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not making fun of the lifestyle, it’s the the fact that people who partake in these things seemingly bring it up for no reason.

            But honestly I can’t remember the last time a vegan brought up being a vegan for no reason. While here on lemmy it seems every opportunity someone has to claim Linux superiority, no matter how weak, they have to let everyone know how “objectively better” they are.

          • pyre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            nah it’s just a reputation because people who make these choices usually try to spread the word, but sometimes it becomes perceived as obnoxious. vegans just got a bad reputation because it was relatively early internet days, i haven’t seen vegans being as obnoxious as weed smokers, for example.

            now, weed smoking is objectively not a better lifestyle choice but i think they’re much much worse than vegans ever were. has nothing to do with arguing against things, not that I would argue against veganism anyway; i admire the choice.