depending on specs it will be a little power hungry, but a good virtualization platform.

yes, the power supplies are likely redundant and the server will complain if they are not both powered.

it will use a VGA connection, but you should be ale to find cheap VGA monitors or cheap adapters.

RAID controllerfor those drives? how many processors and cores? how much RAM? what OS are you planning on running on it? iDRAC included? (if so, likely idrac6, but still usable)

this hardware is very well supported by linux - I have used these older servers extensively. your boss was right to be excited for you. its a great exploration platform that you will be able to do lots of things with.

fire up a live linux distro and get detailed specs on the box - that will guide what you can play with right away.

this is next level insanity and I am in awe.

and thats ok. some great work has been done making the impractical practical. the article was a good think piece. it did its job.

indeed. it will serve you well in many, many… situations.

another security site that pretends to “require” JS to view. are you kidding me?! seriously?!

anyway Firefox reader view to the rescue. and dont frequent or trust “security” focused sites that require JS. just dont.

pretty much. learning things without a corresponding “oh… shit.” moment, just never quite stick with you the same way.

it be there! ;-)

awesome job!

peachy keen, friend. peachy keen.

GNUs Not Unix. I don’t recall him claiming it was. if he did, well… :-/

didnt finish the video but, seriously, one of the best laymans explainations I have seen of emulation and thin compatibility layers.

Instead of making its code more efficient, the system tried to modify its code to extend beyond the timeout period.

doing the “stupid”, “easy” thing. pack it up, bois. been a good run but we finally made a better human.

yes, but you really don’t want to nat if you dont have to - gets too messy too quickly when direct IP connectivity is right there.

@[email protected] parent comment is correct. check routes on device C. make there is either a default route or a specific route back to A via B.

seeing it now on fdroid.

they are. props, however, for system76 branching out into their in-house hardware.

this thread is it in a nut shell. the x11/wayland situation can trip things when it really should be super seamless. that will be fixed soon enough.

if you are ok with an Ubuntu base (which these days is drifting further from its Debian base) then regular mint is great.

if forced…

1. Debian stable (or sid if you loathe/love yourself)
2. lmde
3. mint
4. something other than ubuntu
5. …
6. ubuntu

not hating on ubuntu, its just been moving away from where I am at.

clamav is an option but, if you get to the point of thinking about clam, I would pull the storage device and scan with clam on a known clean machine (cuz you never know what a nasty may have done to the victim PCs EFI / bootchainI)

interestingly, this is likely the most truthful and practical statement I have read today.

as a followup to how useful your visualization is, I have started spreading comments across a wider selection of instance communities.

this is something I have considered before, but your visulazation made the possible utility and usefulness of doing so much more “real”.

this is really, really interesting. thank you for this.

instance reach and relationships are pretty wild and I can see this helping people to mix up their communities between instances.

the tight groupings of some instance communities might be source of pride or distress, depending.

would be nice to select a community and query its n closest overlap neighbors or all neighbors within a certain distance.

very cool project.