justOnePersistentKbinPlease

Its why Carney is so popular in Canada.

He hasnt attacked Poilievre. When asked he comes out with well reasoned and thought out plans.

E.G. instead of just “cutting red tape” to aid housing construction, which results in shit quality and developers timing completion to optimize prices; his plan is to directly get the government to build homes like it did in the 1950s and 1960s. This would also help get people into and trained in the trades, another of his promises.

Also, government employing directly will always be more efficient than contracting out. Because the contracting firms charge 5-10x per employee what the employee makes. For a western salary.

Nah, but I would expect its price to be in the low 5 figures, maybe 6 figures.

It was built for the living, free internet.

For all ita dark corners, it was better than what we have now.

Dont forget strip mining the Amazon Rainforest at a positively Soviet scale of devastation.

Proof. I am asking for anything for you to back up what you are claiming.

All of those things require context. Something LLMs cannot ever understand; it is a hard limit of the statistical analysis that LLMs use.

Edit: also, here is proof of cognitive decline brought about as a result of feeding LLM outputs back into LLM models: https://bmjgroup.com/almost-all-leading-ai-chatbots-show-signs-of-cognitive-decline/

Show me documentation of any of this actually happening and being effective. @

E.G. Dell has had automated logistics for more than 20 years. LLMs would make it less efficient, since they aren’t anywhere near as fast or efficient as regular programs. And they hallucinate. Ditto Ikea and a few others for that matter. E.G.2. LLMs cannot and will not “fine tune” robotic movements. The movement of a robotic arm is either hand-programmed, or done with a mathematical process called Inverse Kinematics to move them between two points. They are already fine tuned.

You don’t need vision systems in a warehouse. That’s what QR and barcode scanners are for.

I am amused that of all innovations available, you are going 250 years back to a very basic machine. Next you’ll be comparing LLMs to the concept of sand casting copper ax blade being better than knapping a rock into a hamd ax.

Not something like how Email, SMS and Instant messaging have almost completely replaced fax and telephone calls.

Sorry, but warehouse pickers and packers are not, and will never be at risk from LLMs.

Because they’re already obsolete from standard 30 year old robotics.

Also anything requiring precision, suited and accuracy isnt ever going to be viable for LLMs to replace. The technology isn’t designed for that and is not capable of meeting a human. E.G. for general automaton: US automotive giants Ford and GM tried to go fully automated for production in the 1980s and 1990s, but reverted some of the automation when it turned out that their senior machinists were better and faster than the robots, saving the companies more than a million dollars per person per year.

The worst part of non-fascist Xitter.