I believe the reason Fedora does this is to satisfy their regulatory goals, I don’t know the full story behind why they have their own seemingly broken build of OBS on their repo but I would imagine it has something to do with a codec’s worldwide licensing rights or similar. I believe the approach that should be taken is that Fedora should stop offering this package in a broken state as compared to continuing to do so, but that’s an outsider opinion.
They put their repo first on the list. Packages will default to Fedora’s repo if available. You may specify which version you want, if you both know that it’s happening and know that the package you want in particular is available at both.
I really again do not know how this could possibly be the fault of another repository. Fedora is making decisions for ther distro that circumvent FlatHub, this is not FlatHub’s fault.
This isn’t about Flathub. The problem is that Fedora has their own flatpak repo and the packages there take priority over the properly-maintained ones in FlatHub, per OBS.
Not that what you’ve mentioned is wrong, but in this comment section that’s a different topic than what we’re discussing.
Meanwhile I had crackling audio after resume the last like 5 or so times I resumed my steam deck from sleep.
Sorry this meme wasn’t for relevant to you, I guess?
I don’t understand, are you bemoaning that the company in question who owns benchy is ending things amicably?
They changed the license on benchy, which is the thing that they needed to do to end the whole fiasco. I saw plenty of discussion and the internet is really good at inflaming passions. I wouldn’t classify what I saw as panic, but I think concern and confusion was rampant.
It was a collaboration, although I’m having trouble finding a source for who wanted it first.
I don’t disagree, and also I think it would be better if this were framed as a failing of Microsoft instead of being on the consumer.
Sounds like ESET is happy to blame people for not having enough money to buy new computers or enough time and experience to switch to Linux.
Makes me wonder what necessitates this “security disaster”. Surely, there is no other reasonable course of action that anyone aside from the consumer could take. I’m sure that ESET is only interested in avoiding security issues in writing that it would be the consumer’s fault for not replacing their OS on, say, a two year old appliance to an entirely different, worse version that has different and unnecessary hardware requirements.
In the interest of getting the info out there considering it’s uncertain to me whether that’s allowed or not (so it doesn’t get removed, primarily), the one I’m seeing starts off “To the Feds”. It’s easy to find.
That doesn’t match the ones I’m seeing being reported on, is that one a different one than the ones I’m seeing reported?
The question before it was a multiple choice question that included “a Harassment threaten to abandon and/or physical or verbal intimidation”.
Seems like it lost the context of “choosing multiple choice answers” and interpreted the prompt wrong.
Edit: To be clear: This is a garbage hyped-up auto-complete that has failed at the task it’s being shoved into “fixing”. It’s all-around bad. Google is a bad company, Gemini is a bad product that can’t tell the time. And also, this particular article is over-hyping a reasonably understandable bad response given the context of the input and the understanding that Gemini is a bad product.
The product (I don’t want to call it AI because it seems like giving it too much credit) isn’t just deciding to tell people that they should die, the product is incapable of rational thought and the math that governs its responses is inherently unstable and provides unavoidably inconsistent results that can never be trusted as fit for any purpose where reasoning is required.
I want to be mad at it for the right reasons and be raging against Google and the current crop of technocratic grifters with my eyes wide open and my course set to ram into them instead of blindly raging off in the wrong direction.
Gotta make sure the root language is removed also. Add --no-preserve-root for that.
That’s not what it’s there for. It can also be used that way.
I’m in tears, I’ve finally found the version of this toy I had as a kid.
Thank you so much for this shitpost, sincerely.
Nano is the tool that people use when they don’t have a need for TUI editors in general and therefore don’t want to have to memorize how people with teletypes decided things should have been done 75 years ago and who also don’t want to get dragged into endless pointless bickering arguments about which set of greybeards was objectively right about their sets of preferences.
I’m glad people enjoy the editors they use and also I just wanna change a single fuckin line in a config file every once in a while without needing to consult a reference guide.
They don’t seem to provide a source for that. It’s probably fake, and also this post is frustratingly clickbaity for my tastes.
It seems like their pianist might be out for now, still flapping in the wind as it were. Should be able to get a firm handshake deal though, and hopefully that gets the pianist to come on stage again.
(This is all japes, no clue about the real answer.)
Fluffernutrer is real and delicious, and if you haven’t had the chance to try it, please do.
The reference the graphic cites is blogspam, the infographic is a weird ad for TitleMax that someone did presumably put time into. Unfortunately, it is good effort put towards bad information.
The reference in question, from the bottom of the image: https://www.ezcater.com/lunchrush/office/america-50-iconic-sandwiches/
One of the sandwiches is a bratwurst on a hot dog bun. It has the feel of an AI hallucination.
I think it’s more convenient to their overall design of modern Windows, IIRC by default it’ll install the running version of Windows to a hypervisor also. For their purposes, for the majority of users, there would be little to no performance losses.