

I mean I was asking about your complaint. Never heard of a Linux desktop that needs to be treated like a server before
I mean I was asking about your complaint. Never heard of a Linux desktop that needs to be treated like a server before
What distro 😳
Not just thinking, I’m doing it
Ur not gonna believe this but guess what I’m doin rn
You do that in your nginx config, it’s only a few lines. Basically define the endpoint that you want to forward to the internal service then setup the destination IP and port.
Configuring nginx as a reverse proxy seems like the simplest way to expose your stream.
Is Orwell the systemd devs?
As far as the lock one, I have watched the lock picking lawyer open a padlock with a ramset gun 🙄 so yes it does work.
You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.
I think I’m good 👍
Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from “opening ports”?
They’re probably just using CGNAT.
The server must have to send some metadata to the client telling when it’s running an ad because there are other things that need to happen client side during that like adjusting of the time or making the ad clickable
Imagine not having all your system settings in plain text files 😬
I have used Windows since I was a child and I still need “documentation” to do routine things, because they hide stuff 8 levels deep inside an obscure settings window that requires an arcane ritual to access.
I right click in nautilus to open the properties window and check the checkbox :)
new sudo vulnerabilities? how exciting!
E: read the article, I guess that is part of the reason for the proposal. interesting
I think it’s going to need a bigger spool of filament.
And a forklift to load it.
Removed by mod
Red hat on a disc from a for dummies book at the library.
Bet