Obvi
The trillion dollar problem is paying billions of pesky workers to work
It went from a patriarchal normative, to being reclaimed. Are people down voting over the ambiguity of “polite”? Or because rediscovering the term “reclaimed” isn’t really a shower thought?
Probably harder on a tiger.
I think the direct implication is that the bullets are padded with foam. Softened.
Apparently it’s on a 12 foot antenna. That’s crazy. I thought for sure they’d be communicating on a much larger dish.
I’d wager the data rate is pretty low, to increase the fidelity.
since November 2023, when a computer malfunction on board the spacecraft caused it to return garbled data.
Upsigh down? Or upside ouwn?
Usually when people say “gender is a social construct” they mean that when your 7th grade biology teacher told you there are males and females, there was more to the story.
If someone tried to tell you that you can fit everything into either the “food” bucket or the “not food” bucket, you would definitely have questions. How do we define food? Food for whom?
If you define food as something edible, with nutritional value… How much nutritional value? A stone covered in lichen probably has nutritional value and I might try to eat it if I were starving to death. Raw grains of wheat might have nutritional value but also might make me sick of I ate them whole, but we all recognize they are generally edible and are usually processed into bread.
“Food” is a useful concept in that it can usually help guide humans toward sustenance. It was never meant as some airtight philosophical concept.
Every word is created through human interaction.
Are you saying that because most people wouldn’t consider acorns and dandelions edible, or worth processing into food, that the definition of food is meaningless?
Or are you saying that yes you can technically est mud and rocks (what is salt, anyways?) that food is a meaningless concept?
You can drink your coffee from a bowl but that doesn’t make it a mug.
It’s called a “system” normally.
I have a captain crunch whistle so I hear it anytime I want to!
I agree that “all powerful” is an ambiguity here. For example, the famous “can he make a boulder so heavy he can’t move it?”
There will always be paradoxes in the universe. So you’d have to go to each respective believer to figure out what “all powerful” means. Maybe making a utopia is impossible.
Philosophy is fun
The ultimate security by obscurity. Do you have a 30m antenna? Can you point it exactly at the space ship with almost no error? Do you know what it’s code and protocols are? OK, please reprogram Voyager
Boeing investors are probably thinking twice.
It’s a little different because people complained, Pelosi (aka the party listened) acted.
I our current political system, the game theory just doesn’t work for much besides a two party system.