Well if they didn’t even notice an axis on a graph, they might be too stupid for a graph…

My point was only to say that 5% is very mich visible on a 0-100% graph.

5% is noticeable unless the graph is under 20 pixels tall. Even then, dithering or antialiasing techniques could make it visible.

Nope, you’ve already explained how you are too stupid. Do better. Stop being a heartless moron. Being a hypocrite for a good reason is good. The fact you disagree is beyond pathetic. Sad.

Being right and good is far, far, FAR better than the simple act of not being a hypocrite…

I’d MUCH rather someone be a “hypocrite” by deciding to do good things later, than by being a hypocrite for wanting to do bad things…

If you disagree, your morals are beyond fucked up.

IMO, “One app/library/etc does one thing only” is a rather ignorant form of wisdom about encapsulation, anyways.

Encapsulation is important regardless of how many disparate tasks a library handles. Doing one thing with one thing is a pretty good rule of thumb to get close to good results, but it is FAR from a golden standard, and serves to drag people away from the finer nuances of encapsulation.

The ONLY time it is a hard and fast rule is at the individual function level. A single function ideally should have one task to accomplish, even if that task has side effects.

I’m sure there are cross-dependency issues on an OS level that makes it a bit wiser to do for widely used system tasks, but to make it an absolute rule smacks of wisdom gone awry. Like not eating shellfish in the bible.

That makes precisely ZERO of it OK.

It’s good in a campy sort of way. If you don’t smile at silly props or premises, it’s a pass. Though if you’re OK with silly shit for the sake of a zany experience, it’s pretty good.

Yea, it’s not C that is crap, but that it has zero guard rails. Like blaming a knife for not having a guard… Is it a bad knife without a guard? Depends on how sharp it is. The guard is orthogonal to the knife’s purpose, but might still be important when the knife is used.

Just because something doesn’t help prevent accidents does not mean it cannot serve its actual purpose well, unless its actual purpose is safety.

Memory safe language that’s becoming viable … as a proper replacement of C.

There are many other memory safe languages out there. Just not ones most would like to pull in to the kernel…

It is both.

That was, in fact, wrong.

Just because there is a high priority present doesn’t magically make it ok to throw your humanity out the window… Why do I have to explain this!? Are you a sociopath?!

That ENTIRE SHOW was about how he had many chances to choose to not be a piece of shit. Every spiral was because of him. He is, in fact, a terrible person, and the fact you cannot understand that is concerning. Having one singular noble goal does NOT magically absolve him of all of his terrible decisions.

This is about finding “solutions” for stupid people that can then be used to extract information and wealth from them. That’s a capitalist problem. Tech bros are merely one flavor of snake oil salesman.

wait, how does one rub while also making the hands a less-rubbed place?

WRONG!! The genitals aren’t quite as sensitive to pain as many other regions. There are different kinds of nerve endings, and while that region is filled with quite a few, most don’t respond to your brain as pain when triggered.

Sure, the region is going to be VERY off-putting to many, and it’s absolutely capable of feeling pain, but it’s still interesting how things play out.

Yes, it should start at not trusting them, but this move distinctly and specifically means they are EVEN LESS trustworthy.

It is ABSOLUTELY good enough when the question is about TRUST.

He’s not making positive claims that specific things will happen. He’s saying don’t trust putting a wolf in charge of the hen house.

The fact you do not understand this basic tenant of life is frankly pathetic.

Yes, a speculative claim … from someone who absolutely knows what the fuck they’re talking about.

You are the only one wasting time by giving dumbass avoidance advice instead of telling us what you know.

… What insider information do you have and why do you want to keep us ignorant???

The question was, “why is this a technical limitation?” Not, “what should I do to work around the limitation?”.

Personally, I would not feel comforted by an LLM telling me racism is real, but the last bit makes total sense, “… this technology highlights the need for increased representation and training …”

Better than nothing, I’m sure, but this country has a BAD habit of turning, “better than nothing” in to the only option available, and usually at a stupid price…