NixOS?
I switched to it not even three months ago, after two years on arch and I’m not going back. Just as if not more configurable than arch and it’s actually harder to bloat with something and then forget about it, since you always have user-readable description of your current system.
Although, it’s possible to bloat it unknowingly: networkmanager, for example, depends on a few VPNs noone would ever need, and one of them depends on webkitgtk, so you actually have to mkForce modules to include only the necessary stuff. Not like that’s a huge issue, but I wasn’t amused when I saw “building webkitgtk” while cross-compiling 😆
What if I don’t have the socks?
Believe it or not, Arch Linux.
I got lost and now I have Mint.
What if I’m an email administrator who came from Timex/Sinclair?
BTW, I approve of this chart
Which based OS should I go for?
if you are looking for a HURD based stable OS you are a bit out of luck.
you mean baby’s first distro?
Hurd, surely?
GNU Hurd/Guix aka the GNU System
I’d just like to interject for a moment. What you’re refering to as GNU Hurd, is in fact, GNU-Linux, or as I’ve recently taken to calling it, GNU minus Linux.
Pure sectarianism. Simple binary Linux, how is it better than Ubuntu?
Tfw you install endeavour and after some time you consider swapping to pure arch because that icon is just so god damn perfect.
Something phishy is going on
I hate how good Arch is! It’s like the more exciting, younger co-worker constantly seducing me to leave my wife Debian.
What if I’m a graphics’s designer that comes from FreeBSD
ASCII art does count as graphics I guess.
Before that, we need to talk about the latent heat and the refrigeration cycle
Arch?
Lisa, we obey the laws of thermodynamics in this house!
You break the laws of everything that is natural
