I dunno what the plural of “Manjaro” is.

  • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I still see no point of using Manjaro when it’s still basically crippled Arch. Why not use Arch itslef? If installation is too much, there’s archinstal or EndeavourOS. It’s just puzzling to me.

    To clear it up, I don’t use either of them. But if I had to pick, I’d go with Endeavour much rather than Manjaro.

    • Rikj000@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I went with Manjaro due to the way they do their package releases.

      Arch is bleeding edge,
      a double edged sword if you ask me,
      all the latest versions,
      and all the bugs that come along with them.

      I’m looking for stability in my daily driver though.

      Manjaro keeps releases a few weeks back on their stable branch.
      And tests the releases first on their unstable and testing branches.
      Resulting in near bleeding edge with enhanced stability on the stable branch.

      • nodiet@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I used to think like you but have been using endeavouros for the last 2 years or so and never felt like I an lacking stability.

    • lemmyvore@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Manjaro offers a stable branch, pamac, upgrade snapshots, package manager, kernel manager, driver manager, and is optimized for LTS kernels. It takes a lot of the edge off Arch.

      If that’s not something you need that’s fine. Some of us do.

      • Adanisi@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Packages delayed by a week or so is not “stable”, in either sense of the word

        In fact, that can break things. Especially with AUR use