• jogai_san@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    I…don’t think I need to.

    You dont need to indeed, but since you mentioned them first.

    If you’re unfamiliar with all of this, that’s your job to get educated.

    I’m a software engineer from way before the js hype, so I think I’m properly educated thanks.

    The “proof” is right there in all it’s glory for you to peruse.

    Indeed, here is the api part: https://github.com/dbgate/dbgate/tree/master/packages/api

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      That is a LOCAL running interface. It’s not something being run as a server-side interface in the docker container.

      I’m not sure what point you’re trying to make, but at this point, you’re original concern and question has been answered.

      • jogai_san@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        The point is: DBgate is capable of running in a container which makes a connection to a database. You insist this is not how it works, but yet its the way I have set it up.

        My question was if outerbase is usable in the same way. You clearly have not enough knowledge to answer that, so no, my question isnt answered.