cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/24850430

EDIT: i had an rpi it died from esd i think

EDIT2: this is also my work machine and i sleep to the sound of the fans

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good choice. I think people often invest too much into hardware and SBCs, when an old laptop does just fine. Just monitor the battery or remove it, if you run that for years and unsupervised in the broom closet.

    • StitchIsABitch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I started out with a laptop and it worked fine, but I always wondered, wouldn’t the energy consumption be much higher? Even with the screen off, a laptop isn’t made to run 24/7, right?

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I think it’s mainly the battery that isn’t made for 24/7 charging. The other components are fine. And as a laptop is made not to waste electricity, it’s efficient with the energy consumption, too. Just turn off the screen and it’ll use as much as a Raspberry Pi or less…

    • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Depends. If you want something that will keep your files reasonably safe and accessible then a laptop isn’t great because most of them won’t let you mount multiple hard drives without doing something silly like running everything over USB.

      Of course that’s where an old desktop is the computer of choice.

      • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Yeah, it really depends on the use-case. I’ve attached several external harddisks via USB to unsuitable hardware before. That kinda works, but isn’t a good choice. But for some selfhosting of Bitwarden, home autiomation and calendar sync, an old laptop is more than enough. After that I bought an efficient mainboard, lots of RAM and built my own NAS for my files, and it does the other stuff as well.

        • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yeah, it doesn’t take a lot to build a decent home server. I just rebuilt mine (the old one’s Turion II Neo was perhaps a bit too weak) and the most expensive part were the HDDs. I didn’t want to reuse the old ones.

          A slightly underclocked Athlon 3000G, 16 gigs of spare RAM, and three 4 TB WD Reds give me all the power I actually need at a reasonable power budget. I initially wanted to go with an N100 but those never support more than two SATA drives directly.

      • pezhore@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know if I can completely explain the difference, but I would classify myself as a home labber not a self-hoster.

        I use Proton for email and don’t have any YouTube/Twitter/etc alt front ends. The majority of my lab (below) is storage and compute for playing around with stuff like Kubernetes and Ansible to help me with my day job skills. Very little is exposed to the Internet (mostly just a VPN endpoint for remote lab work).

        I view self-hosting as more of a, “let me put this stuff on the internet instead of of using a corporation’s gear” effort. I know folks who host their own Mastodon instance, have their own alt front ends for various social media, their own self-hoster search engines.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Homelab = I have a bunch of computers I experiment and learn with, often breaking stuff and starting from scratch

        Self-host = I have a bunch of computers where I run my own email service, I replaced Netflix with plex/jellyfin, I have a Minecraft server for my friend group, etc

        • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Thanks! I am still pretty inexperienced so I’m inadvertently doing both at the same time with the same few machines haha

          • Tja@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s the thing, it’s pretty typical to have both and do both at the same time! You just have some machines more stable so you don’t wipe your photos when you break k8s.

  • llii@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Don’t worry, I’m using an over 10 year old on-board Atom Mainboard, and it works fine with several services running.

  • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    w520 goes hard. Still a very capable machine with the sheer amount of cpu horsepower it has from that era.

    Not comparable to modern chips of course, but for what you can get those things for, damn it’s not bad.

  • Prinz Kasper@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I bought a cheap mini PC with an Intel N100 processor as my entry into self hosting, so far it absolutely crushes every task I’ve thrown at it

  • panicnow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I use an Asus laptop I bought during COVID as my server. I dropped in 64GB of RAM, a pair of NVM drives and an old 2.5” SATA SSD. More than enough for my use cases. The only real software tweak I made was limiting battery charging to 60%.

      • panicnow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        For my Asus laptop the setting is maintained at the hardware level. I didn’t bother trying to find Linux software that could control it (I think there is one) but instead just booted into Windows and set it there and it will persist after that in Linux.

  • zod000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If wanting to have cool oscilloscopes and blinkenlights is wrong then I don’t want to be right.

  • jroid8@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    How would you connect to your “server” when you don’t know it’s IP? With static IP or DNS or both?

    • boreengreen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Dynamic DNS or static IP. Whatever is convenient for you. If humans are connecting, it is generally prefered to type in a domain name, rather than an IP address.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah dynamic DNS works pretty good for me, after I set it up I never had any problems with it.

    • Kelo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      For local services? - just type in static IP that I’ve assigned myself, otherwise I have a subdomain pointing to my online services. works like a charm

  • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    the best home server is a computer you’re not using, the second best home server is a bajillion dollar server rack you looted from behind a meta LLM farm

  • kratoz29@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    My only “server” is a modest DS218+ which runs more mainstream services that I see in those huge ass servers like in the pic, what am I missing? (I have 6 GBs of RAM):

    • Arr stack (Bazarr, Sonarr, Radarr, Overseerr, Prowlarr)
    • Plex
    • Calibre and Calibre web
    • DizqueTV
    • Dozzle
    • Flaresolverr
    • Heimdall
    • Iperf3 server
    • JDownloader2
    • Komga
    • Openspeedrest
    • Pi-hole
    • Plex-Auto-Languages (for the Synology PMS and my Nvidia Shield TV Pro)
    • PlexTraktSync
    • Portainer
    • Qbittorrent
    • Riven/Rclone/Zurg
    • Speedtest
    • Tautulli (X2)
    • Vaultwarden
    • Zerotier

    Everything is silent and running with Docker, aside from a bunch of stock Synology services (and Tailscale), I really feel like the only reason to own better hardware is for a better transcoding experience… And usually you don’t want to transcode.

    • mugdad1@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      dayem buddy thats cool i’m still a noob in selfhosting and using docker im using some containers like adguardhome and metube photoprism and memos still tweaking cuz i started 1 week ago

    • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d say not just starter… My rack is full of tiny/mini/micros. Proxmox on all, data on the three NAS boxes, easy to replace a box if needed (for example, the optiplex 7040 that the board died on).

      Way quieter than a regular rack, lower power use, etc. If all goes well following an intended move, I should be able to safely power it off solar + batt only. Grand total wattage for all these boxes is less than my desktop (when I last checked at least, I was running about 300-350W. I did swap two that have dgpu’s now, so maybe a touch higher).

      • pezhore@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        My homelab is three Lenovo M920q systems complete with 9th gen i7 procs, 24GB ram, and 10Gbps fibre/Ceph storage. Those mini PCs can be beasts.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I recently got a M710q with an i3 7100T. It uses around 3W on idle. I threw 8GB of RAM and a 512GB ramless NVMe for a total of under 100€. Absolutely would recommend (if you don’t need too much storage). Also Dell has some machines.

      For more info, servethehome (they have a YouTube channel and a blog) has a whole series on “tiny mini micro” machines.

        • Rudee@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          DRAM-less NVMe drives don’t have what basically amounts to a cache of readily accessible storage that makes large reads and writes faster. So they’re cheaper, but slower, and wear out faster

        • Sinaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Some fancy SSDs have additional DRAM cache:

          The presence of a DRAM chip means that the CPU does not need to access the slower NAND chips for mapping tables while fetching data. DRAM being faster provides the location of stored data quickly for viewing or modification.

          Source