Thx in advice.

  • themadcodger@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pop_OS or Linux Mint. Both just work. The Atomic idea is nice, but still too soon for complete beginners or the lazy (not a pejorative).

  • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would recommend Vanilla OS, especially Vanilla OS 2 once it’s released. It’s a very stable distro with an immutable system. It also allows you to install arch, debian, fedora, etc. packages using the apx package manager

    • Agility0971@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ok, this depends.

      I had some trouble providing support for a friend after I’ve recommended Vanilla OS. I believe it will be a good OS in the future but not now.

    • db2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seconded. I’ve been using it for years because it just works, but if I want to try to break shit do things myself I can.

    • markstos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I researched this question for a laptop to sell on eBay. I tried Pop OS and Mint and choose Mint.

      It seems that Mint may be the most popular distro for older Linux laptops sold on eBay.

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s exactly what I did with my old Core2Duo laptop because I couldn’t in good conscience sell it with factory-loaded Win-Vista LOL.

        If somebody with knowhow gets it, they can put whatever they want on it. If someone without? They get a solid OS that gets security updates. Win-win.

  • Corgana@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu if you’re used to Mac, Zorin (based on Ubuntu) or Mint if you’re more used to Windows.

    Never used Pop OS but I hear that’s another that works well out of the box.

  • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What are you trying to build? A work laptop that you’re going to take on trips, a gaming computer, a server? Something else?

    For you, what is too much hassle? Are you a new Linux user or an experienced user with no spare time? What are you accustomed to doing when you install an operating system and what do you expect to be preinstalled?

    What is your favorite colour?

    • PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.eeOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Experienced Linux user, but I was just wondering what people think about this, I believe I’m going for Ubuntu, I’m not exactly the kind of guy who will fall on malware anyway, I need something pretty easy to use, configure and working stable WO errors, as my experience I’m tired and have no time to fix shitty OS things.

      I will use it as desktop in a NucBox.

      • Bob Smith@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ubuntu isn’t my favorite, but I used xubuntu for many years. A lot of noise gets thrown around about Snaps, but from an end-user perspective they tend to work fine unless you have very low system constraints. Better than adding a half-dozen repositories that may or may not be around for long. A lot of developers work to make sure that their software runs well in Ubuntu and the LTS releases tend to be a good long-term option if you don’t want any significant changes for a long time.

        Even with their regular releases, I daisy-chained upgrades on an old Core2 laptop for something like seven years without any major (computer becomes a paperweight) issues. Sometimes (like with Snaps) Ubuntu insists on going its own way, which can result in errors/shitty OS things that don’t pop up in other distributions. I’ve had to deal with some minor issues with Ubuntu over the years (broken repositories, upgrades causing hiccups, falling back to older kernels temporarily), but I think that you’ll get issues like that regardless of what distro you pick.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yea, that is why I recommended Mint in top comment.

            With the statement about Arch I wanted to say, that I have no experience with endeavourOS 😂😅

            Edit after reading endeavourOS web page: what is even the difference between endeavourOS vs. Installing arch using the archinstall python script and using yay as package manager?

            • kameecoding@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              Only the installation is harder for Arch, EndeavorOS is easier to use then Mint, and installation is same thanks to the gui installer.

              The difference between Arch with archinstall vs Endeavor is still the ease of installation.

              • Petter1@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                So, the only difference to arch is, that you have a gui for installation? In that case, I like archinstall script more. Mostly because I think it’s faster.

  • strawberry@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    just installed bazzite and after switching to x11 (one button thing) its the first district to have no screen tearing, no stutter

    though this is a very gaming focused district, so maybe not for you

    its derived from universal blue so maybe check that out

  • hojjat@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve got PopOs on my personal (framework) and work (System76) laptop. It’s been super stable. Specially if you don’t mess around with different PPAs.

    • qpsLCV5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      agreed with debian, it’s by far the most stable and no bullshit system i’ve ever used. however, BIG condition: do NOT install .deb files manually. that’s an extremely easy way to break your system. use what’s in the repos, and if it’s not in the repos, use something like flatpak (not sure how well it works for debian since i haven’t used it).

      in general though, if you want a stable linux system, just don’t try to install stuff that isn’t packaged in official repos.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, Debian + Flatpak is a good way to have a very reliable system with all the latest software.

  • UNY0N@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bazzite. It’s made for gaming, but it just works, 0% hassle. I used to love doing lots of stuff with the terminal in arch, but since I switched I haven’t opened the teminal once.