• floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had trouble using Flatseal to adjust permissions for Flatpak applications in Linux Mint. But that was a few months ago and may have been fixed. Other than that I never really had trouble with stuff being broken or unavailable in Mint.

    I guess if you use very new hardware you might prefer a newer kernel than the one Mint uses. Or if you want the latest versions of packages, a rolling distro might suit you better. Or you might prefer a different filesystem. But if none of this bothers you, there’s no need to switch. Mint generally works well.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Honestly I can’t remember the details. It was a few months ago and it may have been just a temporary thing or a quirk of my installation. I think it had to do with some component relating to DBus not being present that I couldn’t figure out how to fix.

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean…

    Steam? Maybe? I dunno, I don’t game but the Steam kids seem to prefer Arch. I’m sure they have their reasons.

    Practically? Probably nothing terribly significant.

    • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think “they prefer” Arch because a lot of them just bought a Steam Deck and that comes with Arch and it just works.

    • phanto@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Steam and Lutris work well! I can game on XFCE Mint just fine. I actually have an easier time of it than on a number of distros, thanks to the combination of flatpaks and the Ubuntu base. But, I am not “the kids”.

    • myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Reasons are usually just newest kernel/mesa/etc. Most of the time the difference is very small, and often inconsequential. However, every now and again there is a major development that might make it worth it (IE: The graphics pipeline that all but made dxvk-async obsolete)

  • confusedwiseman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    In my experience, not much, but I’m a marginally functional newbie. Mint manages things for you fairly nicely and has been the best, it just works with out messing with much/anything. (At least for my hardware)

    I managed to get gnome working smoothly on mint and have been happy with it. I started and returned here since I last ditched windows as a native OS.

    The only thing that has made me consider distro hopping from mint is AUR on arch and gnome, though I’ve been successful so far.

    Part of trying the distros that are more advanced and give you more explicit control and configuration is the sense of accomplishment and it makes you figure out how and why things work the way they do. It holistically builds your velocity in your understanding of Linux. (Or gnu whatever that nuance is).

    If your machine has enough resources it is super easy to host VMs of anything you want to try. You can try them all, and it won’t cost you anything but time!

    • Nilz@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you feel like you need/want software from AUR you should check out Distrobox. It can run any distro on top of your installation using Docker under the hood, but it tightly integrates into your system so with little effort you can run AUR programs from your launcher as if they were natively installed on your Mint.

  • poo_22@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    With NixOS you can upgrade your entire OS and if you don’t like it roll it back like nothing ever happened. You can also replicate your entire machine by copying your configs over to another computer, running the install, and then copying over any files you have in your home folder and you will have reproduced your desktop.

    You can also very easily use a different version of a packaged app by adding an override in your config. This is useful if you want bleeding-edge features or if something is broken. Also every package is also a development environment, so you don’t have to worry about setting up a dev environment to hack on stuff.

  • superkret@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Nothing, at all.
    Some things you can’t do easily in Mint, like create snapshots automatically and boot into them when something breaks.
    But it’s all Linux and freely available software under the hood, and the lines between configuration, customization and forking your distro are blurry.

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    You can’t easilyy switch between different inages like on an atomic fedora system.

    Do you have to switch now? No.

  • jevans ⁂@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    You can’t have your entire system configuration in a repository of plain text files, which has lots of advantages, but it’s not worth caring about unless you feel excited to get into it.

    • oxomoxo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why not? Isn’t this the whole concept of Bash Script, Ansible, Terraform, etc… I mean it can be as simple as a git repo that pulls down an install script then syncs your dot files. What am I missing? If you’re referencing Nix, you can also have that on Mint.

      • jevans ⁂@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, I’m talking about not just Nix, but NixOS. Nix (the package manager) can do a lot, but NixOS + disko + home-manager can literally be all of the configuration for your machine from drive partitioning through to dot files. Throw in nixos-anywhere and impermanence and you can have an insane amount of control over all of your computers.

        Ansible, Terraform, Chef, etc. do have some overlap, but the main difference is that those tools iterate through the system modifying it piece by piece and NixOS is declarative.

        If something fails in some of my bigger Ansible playbooks, it could mean 30 minutes of just running through all the steps again. I could probably break it into sections, but then I have to worry about making sure they all get run when things get updated. In my NixOS install, it’s way faster, I can roll back to a previous state, and troubleshooting is way easier in my opinion.

  • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Use Pacman as your package manager, or something. Linux is Linux. If you use a mainstream distro it should be 90% similar to all other distros. You don’t really have to worry about FOMO when it comes to Linux.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Serious answer? XFCE doesn’t support multiple monitors with different refresh rates. So that.

    Some of the other answers (like Meta (aka Windows Key) not working for shortcuts) can be hacked around, but unless you switch to a DE that supports Wayland, you will never have stable multi refresh rate differences on multiple monitors.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Serious answer? XFCE doesn’t support multiple monitors with different refresh rates. So that.

      That’s more of a limiation because of X11. KDE and Gnome do not support different refreshrates on multiple monitors as far as I know. Its the main reason why I never used multiple monitors. But on Wayland, this issue is solved. So if XFCE is ported to Wayland, they should also get this support for free I guess.

    • uzay@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not a fan of the xfce UX at all, and multi-monitor support still has a lot of issues (under Debian 12), but I am pretty sure having different refresh rates is possible

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Which keyboard shortcuts do you mean specifically? I think I fixed this exact issue earlier today!

      • umami_wasabi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Meta+arrows key to shift windows around

        Or is the key call Super? I know for sure it’s the “Windows” key.

        • smeg@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yeah that’s the exact issue I fixed yesterday: the Super (Windows) key is configured to open the whisper (start) menu and this overrides any of the other xfce keyboard shortcuts like moving windows around.

          The fix was to go into Settings > Keyboard > Application Shortcuts and change the one that’s set by default to open the whisper menu (xfce4-popup-whiskermenu) to something else. I found some bug reports saying that the problem is that xfce doesn’t expect shortcuts that are “modifier only” (as in only the Super key), and once I changed that one then the shortcuts to move windows around suddenly started working.

          No idea why distros ship with this configuration already broken, but hopefully this helps!