• JGrffn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Can’t relate, just upgraded my laptop from 32GB to 64GB since VScode would keep closing due to OOM. What? Oh, no, it’s not vscode’s fault…I keep like 5 Firefox windows with 30+ tabs open, like a fucking maniac… Close them? What do you mean “close” them?

    • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      No need to convince me. I will always believe people complaining about garbage electron apps.
      That being said, I use vscodium myself and actually like it. Does not mean I won’t complain tho

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I had around 1500 open tabs in Firefox. It was fine. I figured enough was enough and closed them all. Now I close all tabs at the end of the day before shutting down.

          • boonhet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Wait, do people shut down their computers when they’re done using them?

            I know I did on the desktop PC we had at home when I was a kid… But now the desktop doubles as a homeserver (and does that more than it does gaming lately) and the laptop just goes to sleep rather than shutting it down.

            • dan@upvote.au
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              I have a separate home server, so I don’t have a reason to not shut down my desktop PC. No reason for it to be using electricity while it’s doing nothing.

              I shut down my laptop because suspend/sleep support on Linux still isn’t great.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was about to reply to the same thing to another comment about 300 tabs, LOL

    • miss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      When I started hitting OOMs I just downloaded free ram.

      (Modifying my zram-generator config to use 1.5x my ram size instead of the measly 4GB – uncompressed – default. Seriously it’s worth looking into, though default depends on your distro)

      • Grian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Can’t you just add swap?

        I think you can run some apps purely on swap and keep your ram for vscode only

        • miss phant@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          zram is swap on ram, it works by compressing parts of the ram when you run low and it’s much faster than traditional disk-based swap.

    • expr@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      You only need 1 tab to OOM if that tab is Jira. I’ve literally had tabs take up more than 10GB.

  • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    True story. I remember back in the bad old days when Firefox had notorious memory leaks, so when building my latest PC, I put in 32GB. The monitor app on my desktop has only ever topped out at showing 30% of memory allocated.

  • Dave@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    I use a shit load of RAM on Linux. You guys clearly have amateur numbers when it comes to how many applications you have open at once.

    • luluu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Multiple Firefox windows, at least one JetBrains IDE, and some other apps and I fill 20-30GBs easily. Sometimes on the lower end, sometimes on the higher end.

    • Pasta Dental@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      And hitting high memory pressure is really not fun on Linux (on Fedora at least), it simply locks up and slows down to a crawl and does nothing for minutes until the oom killer finally kills the bad program. I’ve kind of solvd this by installing a better oom killer on my laptop, but my desktop was easy: buy 32GB of additional ram for like 90$: problem solved

      • Ephera@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Hmm, it’s been a few years since I’ve run Fedora, but that’s an experience also still stuck in my head from that time.

        I always figured, Linux had just gotten better at that, because I switched to a more up-to-date distro afterwards, but in retrospect, it’s not like Fedora is terribly out of date, so maybe that is just a weird configuration on Fedora…

      • Dave@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I like to have a 50GB+ swap file. Though Fedora is a bit weird with swap files as by default it’s stored in RAM (Yes, extra space for RAM is stored in RAM. I… admit I don’t understand the detail).

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s not hard to max out when doing simulations in Blender, but I know I have a niche use case.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Y’all need to point me towards one of those tiny Linux systems. I have an old no-longer-bricked Toshiba Satellite that somebody gave me and I got it to boot again, so I slapped Mint on it to see how I liked it since I’ve never messed with that distro before. The only problem is this sucker is a dog, it’s only got 2 gigs of RAM and a pokey 5400 RPM platter drive in it. The thing sits there and thrashes swap constantly even when it’s doing nothing, and when Mint is creating one of its automated system image rollback things it’s completely unusable. I’m surprised the laptop platters don’t escape their casing and bore into the Earth like a drill bit.

    I found that it will… eventually… load and run the latest FreeCAD build and once it’s going it’s actually not bad (awful screen resolution and single touch only trackpad notwithstanding). But getting there when taken altogether takes about 20 minutes…

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        You absolutely need swap on a low RAM system. It’s the only way the system will actually be usable. You’ll hit OOMs (out of memory errors) that take down the whole GUI if you turn off swap on a system with only 2GB RAM. You can only really turn off swap if you have a very large amount of RAM, and even then, it’s safer to keep it enabled and set swappiness to 0 instead.

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            If you can find it :) DDR2 is old enough that a lot of it has been thrown out as e-waste. If you’re lucky, you may be able to find some at a computer/electronics recycler for free.

    • notthebees@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I use bunsenlabs helium on my old vaio a series laptop. I use a 32 bit non pae build bc it’s a pentium M that might not support pae. It uses a window manager over a desktop environment.

      I’d recommend using a 32 bit distro as they tend to take up a little less ram.

      Also I’m on a 4200 rpm PATA HDD. It has 2 gb of ddr ram. It’s slightly too old to get ddr2 which is unfortunate.

    • SpikesOtherDog@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      If you can afford it, a SSD will significant improve your life. Also, any more memory will help.

      As others said, you can disable swap.

      Are you running the xfce version of Mint? It’s significantly less resources.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        you can disable swap.

        Be careful with disabling swap if you don’t have a very large amount of RAM, as many apps rely on memory overcommitment and a large virtual address space, which can behave erratically without swap.

        You’d be better off keeping swap enabled and instead setting vm.swappiness = 0 in sysctl.conf.

        Swappiness is a value between 0 and 100, where 0 means to never swap unless absolutely necessary (only if you completely run out of RAM), and 100 means all programs and data will be swapped nearly instantly. Think of it like a target for the percentage of RAM to keep available. The default is usually 40 which is fine for a low-RAM system, but swaps way too often for a system with more RAM.

  • kevincox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago
    % free -h
                   total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
    Mem:           125Gi        15Gi        90Gi       523Mi        22Gi       110Gi
    Swap:           63Gi          0B        63Gi
    

    I’ll use it eventually. Just gotta let the disk cache warm up.

      • kevincox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        I have enough disk space.

        Plus my /tmp is a ramdisk and sometimes I compile large things in there (Firefox) so it is nice to let it be flushed out to disk if there are more important uses for that RAM than holding a file that most likely won’t be read again.

          • kevincox@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yes. As this is a workstation the memory use is highly variable, >95% of the time I would probably barely notice having 32GiB. But other times it is a huge performance win to have that capacity available. Sometimes I am compiling lots of stuff and 32 compilers running + ample disk cache is very important. Other times I am processing lots of data and other times I am running a few VMs.

            It is a bit of a luxury. I think if I was on a tighter budget I would have gone for 64GiB. However the price difference wasn’t that much and at least a handful of times I have been quite happy to have that capacity available. And worst case I just have everything sitting in disk cache after a warm up which is a small performance win on every small task.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    That’s how I got a free netbook. The netbook had 32GB flash with windows and office occupying 27+GB. Then windows wanted to do an update - with an 8+GB file. Spot the problem. And windows can get quite annoying with updates. As the netbook could not be expanded, and attempts to redirect the update to a USB stick did not work, a newer netbook was bought, and I got the old one. Linux plus libreoffice plus a bunch of extras happily sat in 4GB…

  • SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    i mean, some games (cough cough factorio cough cough) manage to use up about 25GB of ram on my system, so it’s nice to have a buffer. now, my 64GB may be considered a bit overkill but i call it future proofing