Definitely. Once the company reach certain level of annual turnover it must implement A-Z security measures or be fined out of existence would be great. I even go as far as making it personal liability for upper management if they deliberately try to circumvent those requirements.

Since you deleted your post on [email protected], reposting my comment.

Another AI project that will probably be dead in a few months. Also open core not open source as many of the features are not available via self-hosted version.

Self-hosted version which source is available and hosted-version which is not public, are not the same. Or at the very least, planned to not be the same by your own admission as you talked publically about planning on adding paid-only features to hosted version.

Take out “AI features” and you are left with nothing, so yeah, AI project… It also relies on proprietary AI models that you don’t own, so it can stop working at any point and that would be out of your control.

Since you deleted your post on [email protected], reposting my comment.

Another AI project that will probably be dead in a few months. Also open core not open source as many of the features are not available via self-hosted version.

Self-hosted version which source is available and hosted-version which is not public, are not the same. Or at the very least, planned to not be the same by your own admission as you talked publically about planning on adding paid-only features to hosted version.

Take out “AI features” and you are left with nothing, so yeah, AI project… It also relies on proprietary AI models that you don’t own, so it can stop working at any point and that would be out of your control.

That looks to be a troll. ZendeskTeam account was created 1 hour ago and is not part of the org.

But the help article linked is pathetic.

I’m not sure if it’s spelled out in the ToS, but there is no way to prevent pull requests on public repos, it’s a functional requirement.

You have to make a fork aka copy and modify to contribute via pull requests. The license is fundamentally broken.

Don’t take this as an insult, but you really need to come back when there is an independent audit that confirms the claims. Verifying cryptography is not something even a tech-savvy person can do, even if the source code is available.

I noticed this today too, no idea what is going on. Need to reach out to the instance admin, since it’s only happening on my instance as far as I can see.

McAfee blog offers some more details: https://www.mcafee.com/blogs/other-blogs/mcafee-labs/new-android-spyagent-campaign-steals-crypto-credentials-via-image-recognition/

Added to the post body.

Several of mine:

• [email protected]
• [email protected]
• [email protected]
• [email protected]

Gaming communities are hard to grow since they require people who play the game to participate. You can only grow it on your own so much by posting the latest news.

Other active ones on lemmy.zip:

• [email protected]
• [email protected]
• [email protected]
• [email protected]
• [email protected]

https://publiccode.eu/en/

Mattermost is only source-available due to their dual licensing.

Try FreeTube.

Instance blocking only hides communities from that instance, but not users.

You are correct, I somehow got confused… It was v1.2.0 release, I updated my original post. The release didn’t even mention the license change. https://github.com/eythaann/Seelen-UI/releases/tag/v1.2.0

It’s another fake open source license. While source code is public under the license, you can’t modify or republish so if the project decides to sell you are fucked.

v1.2.0 release changed the license from MIT to PolyForm Strict License 1.0.0 which removes ability to re-publish and make changes to the project. In the day when fake open source projects sell out daily, it’s a good sign to avoid this project.

The video is 2 part, first is the summary of the case and another is about why this argument from Disney is the biggest pro piracy argument.

Basically, the case is about a doctor who had a food allergy and went to a Disney owned restaurant that promised to cater to people with food allergies. The doctor asked staff 5 times to make sure they were aware of her allergies, and all 5 times they said yes. It’s literally the most straightforward wrongful death case ever. But then Disney decided they want to fuck more people over, so they made an argument that the case should tossed and move to arbitration because her husband signed up to Disney streaming service on a free trial, years ago. And Disney is ignoring a lot of other facts, like that husband is not the one suing, her estate is, he cancelled the trial before the period ended, so he wasn’t even a subscriber at the time. The streaming site has an arbitration clause, but Disney park doesn’t so it doesn’t even matter. If the case can’t go forward, it will be only because US is a corporate-owned shithole, legally it’s a moot argument.

As far as piracy, it just highlights how fucked up everything is since if the husband just pirated, DIsney couldn’t have used that argument in court. So Disney created a situation now that if you want to be able to sue them for your loved one’s death - pirate Disney. It’s the most pro piracy argument that even the biggest normies can relate to.

Are there countries that have e-voting on a national level apart from Estonia? They had it since 2005 without any major issues.

It requires kernel level access to abuse, so it will probably be mostly used in targeted attacks. General good technical hygiene should be good enough to prevent becoming a random victim.